Fructose consumption and body weight

Fructose is a monosaccharide (simple sugar), which the body can use for energy. Because it does not cause blood sugar rise tremendously, it was once thought that fructose was a good substitute for sucrose (table sugar). However, nutritional experts have changed their minds about this. A small amount of fructose, such as the amount found in most vegetables and fruits, is not a bad thing. In fact, there is evidence that a little bit may help your body process glucose properly. However, consuming too much fructose at once seems to overwhelm the body's capacity to process it and it causes overweight. Is that true?

Acute studies in humans: fructose, food intake and satiety
In an acute-term study (short-term studies with exposure periods usually lasting 48 to 96 hours), 12 normal -weight women consumed meals containing 55, 30 or 15% of total calories as carbohydrate, fat and proteins with 30% of Kcal as either fructose sweetened or glucose sweetened beverages. As expected, glucose excursions and insulin secretion were lower after fructose meals than after glucose ones. This was associated to a decrease in leptin levels (leptin hormones signal your brain that you are full; decrease in leptin levels meaning, less appetite), which is an expected consequence of lowering insulin levels. It is important to notice that the reduction in leptin levels remained within physiological normal levels. Fructose meals might increase caloric intake and ultimately contribute to weight gain and obesity.



Chronic studies in humans
Although acute fructose consumption could not stimulate leptin secretion, an increase in fasting leptin levels was detected after chronic high fructose intake (1 to 4 weeks) in healthy individuals, which may suggest that high fructose feeding may suppress food intake in the long term. Another long term study in overweight/obese humans showed no change in body weight after 10 week-supplementation with glucose or fructose, indicating that the effect of fructose or glucose on food intake might not differ on long term bases.



Cross-sectional studies
In a cross-sectional study, BMI had a statistically positive relationship with diet carbonated soft drink consumption for 1749 of children (6-11 years) and adolescents (12-19 years). Other cross-sectional studies in American children demonstrated a positive correlation between soft drinks and BMI. The obese children consumed more of all types of food with no difference between obese and non obese children's consumption patterns. However, most of the cross-sectional studies included no controls for sedentary behaviors, physical activity, and energy intake from other sources other than beverages in the model. Moreover, in these studies BMI and beverage consumption were self-reported and hence subject to measurements errors. Causal relationship cannot be made from cross-sectional study design.



Longitudinal epidemiologic studies
In a cohort of more than 10,000 males and females (9-14 years in 1996), authors did not find a correlation between BMI and snack food consumption, including sugar-sweetened beverages when controlling for total energy. Even in another study among 30 children aged 6-13 years who was attending a summer camp in 1997, excessive sweetened drink consumption (>370g/day) did not correlate with weight gain. Again results of these longitudinal studies are not conclusive. Most of the positive correlations presented disappeared when corrected by total energy.


Conclusion
The relation between fructose and obesity has been derived mainly from epidemiological studies trying to relate the increase in consumption of dietary fructose on one hand and to the increase in obesity. In the epidemiological, cross -sectional and longitudinal studies, the overall evidence for a positive correlation between consumption of soft drinks and overweight is limited. Causal inferences cannot be made from cross-sectional study designs with values subjected to measurement error. Clearly fructose itself is not driving the obesity epidemic, but there is evidence supporting the possibility that refined carbohydrates in general could have a contributory role, if not a major one. Very recently, this problem has been attributed to all added sugars and not only added fructose. Whatever the cause of obesity, based on the currently available evidence, an expert panel formed by the Centre of Food Nutrition and Agriculture Policy concluded that fructose does not appear to contribute to overweight and obesity any differently than other energy sources (Rizkalla, 2010).


Reference
Rizkalla, S. (2010). Health implications of fructose consumption: A review of recent data. Nutrition & Metabolism. doi:10.1186/1743-7075-7-82. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2991323/?tool=pubmed

Diet Soda vs. Healthy Weight

I have been writing about whether diet coke is better than regular coke for human’s health. I found that my first topic “diet” is relevant to “healthy weight” because recent reports say that diet drinks can cause weight gain and weight gain lead to many disease in our body. Dr.Katz, an internationally renowned authority on nutrition, weight management, and the prevention of chronic disease, says that he believes they can, but the science is not decisive.

The studies suggesting diet sodas, or anything containing sugar substitutes, can contribute to weight gain are based almost entirely on animal research. What scientists have found is that a rodent's brain relies on the link between taste and calories to keep track of just how much eating has occurred. The dissociation between sweet taste and calorie intake may put the regulatory system that controls hunger and body weight out of sync, thus sabotaging weight loss plans.

A study on rodents showed that those fed saccharin actually gained weight compared to rodents fed sucrose. The taste buds tell the brain that food is coming in, but the body doesn't get the energy it's expecting (Katz, 2009).The artificial sweeteners in diet sodas create a negative hormonal response in the body that increases fat storing hormone production and increases cravings for more sweets and refined carbohydrates in the time period after consuming the diet drink. Also people may subconsciously think that because they are drinking a diet soda, that gives them more leeway to eat more of everything else, hence consuming more calories overall.

Though some human studies indicate sugar substitutes help with short-term weight loss, an equal number suggest they don't. My particular concern is that artificial sweeteners are 200 to 13,000 times as sweet as sugar, and that is a potent stimulus for turning a sweet tooth into a fang. Other research suggests that the taste of sweetness is mildly addictive—the more you eat, the more you need to feel fully satisfied. If artificially sweetened sodas increase your cravings, the calories they take out of your diet are apt to sneak back in later when you, for instance, need a larger or sweeter dessert to feel satisfied (Katz, 2009).


People who are overweight, and particularly those who are obese, have higher rates of death and illness than people of healthy weight, both overall and from a range of specific conditions. These include cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure, Type 2 diabetes, sleep apnea, osteoarthritis, psychological problems and reproductive problems for women. Thus, when people drink diet soda when they are on a diet, the diet drink will not be the healthier choice than regular soda because it causes weight gain and it will lead to many health problems.


Reference

Katz, D. (2009, February). Do Diet Drinks Actually Cause Weight Gain? The Oprah Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.oprah.com/health/Can-Diet-Soda-Cause-Weight-Gain

Patient UK. (2010, August). Obesity and Overweight in Adults. Retrieved from http://www.patient.co.uk/health/Obesity-and-Overweight.htm



.

Diet Soda: Pros and Cons.

Blog Post #3

Diet Soda: Pros and Cons.


People who are addicted to diet sodas, they constantly reporting that they are suffering from dizziness, headaches, hair loss, joint pain, depression, anxiety attacks, slurred speech, blurred vision, or memory loss after drinking diet sodas. There are no scientific evidences that those symptoms are caused by consuming aspartame but all the claims of health problems are enough evidence to agree that diet soda may be the cause.

The pro of diet soda is that diet sodas supposedly have less sugar than regular sodas or no sugar at all. Despite the cons, as yet, there's no definitive evidence that the ingredients in diet sodas are harmful, provided you don't drink more than 80 cans (yes, 80) a day.

The cons, the side I am on, is that diet soda still has acid that attacks the enamel on your teeth and a recent study released recently found that they cause health problems and increased the risk factors of some diseases for diabetics. The artificial sweeteners in diet soda metabolized as carbs, and can cause long term health problems. Diet soda increases your risk for type 2 diabetes and heart disease. Three big studies have found that people who drink even one diet soda a day have a greater chance of developing metabolic syndrome, which is a precursor to diabetes and heart disease. Also it doesn't truly quenches thirst, loaded with artificial flavorings and colorings, actually is more likely to make you hungrier than say drinking water. Moreover, some of the health issues that have been related to artificial sweeteners in scientific studies as well as observations are:
* some have been linked to potential cancer risks
* negative effects on the liver, kidneys, and other organs
* stimulating cravings
* gastrointestinal problems
* developmental problems in children and fetuses
* headaches

I agree to the cons side because I used to drink diet coke as a way to make me feel full and satisfied while treating myself to good taste. Diet soda companies are saying that diet sodas are 99% water, so I preferred drinking diet sodas than water. During this time, I started to have headaches, sometimes panic attack and became lethargic. After quit drinking diet soda and drinking only water, I felt much better, become active again and my headache or anxiety attacks gradually disappeared.

Blog post #2

I found this site saying “Diet Coke is 99% Water (And That Is Now a Good Thing)” and there were ridiculous comments such as “I’m glad that diet coke is 99% water. It’s just about all I drink, so it’s good to know I’m getting the recommended 8 glasses of water a day by drinking coke.” In this article, the author is saying that when Diet Coke contains 99% of water and the price is the same but taste better, why people would want to drink water. Diet coke and water is not almost same; they are totally different. This article is lack of credibility for five reasons.

First of all, this is not a scholar article. This post is neither from a blog, newspaper nor a scholar site. Secondly, the author’s occupation is not related to science field.

He is a distinguished service professor of Economics at the University of Chicago. He is an educated and credible man in economics but not in science. Because of this site is based on economics, the post is relevant to economic problems, but the author should have researched why the 1% makes total difference between water and Diet Coke. Thirdly, the post is out of date; it was posted on August 20th, 2007. Almost past four years now. Moreover, there are neither experimental nor epidemiological evidences. None of the evidences of Diet Coke is almost same as water are from controlled, well-designed experiments or clinically proven. Lastly, his belief of Diet Coke is 99% water is an anecdotal fact; it is based on the new print ad that he saw for Diet coke. The company could have said it without pointing out what is the 1% made out of, to just sell more Diet Cokes.


This site is a credible source to prove that Diet Coke and water are different. Everyone drinks water but there are neither side effects nor a study that water is harmful. However, in one study that mentioned in this site, research subjects who consumed more than one daily serving of diet soda had a 36% greater risk of metabolic syndrome: a cluster of risk factors that significantly increases the risk of heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. This study also found that people who consume diet soda daily have a 67% higher risk of type 2 diabetes compared with those who didn't consume diet soda, possibly due to artificial sweeteners' effect on insulin resistance and glucose metabolism. This site is credible because the authors of the article are doctors and the article is from a clinically proven book. The date of this article is written was on November, 2010 which is pretty recent. Lastly, the evidences that Diet Coke is harmful are from experimental bases. Therefore, Diet Coke and water is not almost same they are completely different.


Reference

Levitt, S. (2007, August). Diet Coke is 99% Water (And That Is Now a Good Thing)
Retrieved from http://www.freakonomics.com/2007/08/20/diet-coke-is-99-water-and-that-is-now-a-good-thing/

Yantis, M,A. & Hunter, K. (2010, November). CLINICAL QUERIES: Is diet soda a healthy choice?
Retrieved from http://www.nursingcenter.com/library/static.asp?pageid=1119493

Diet Coke is Not a Healthy Choice.

My name is Julie Hong. I am 22 years old and currently, I am a 5th student at Simon Fraser University majoring in IAT (Interactive Arts and Technology). I am a very outgoing person who loves sports, shopping and dinning out. Recently, I am on a diet because I have gained so much weight after graduating high school. This blog will contain articles related to healthy diet so people who are currently on a diet or planning a diet, please read my posts and share your stories and gain more knowledge on healthy diet. I believe that by blogging including researching and sharing stories of healthy diet, people and I can gain the sympathy with others and that will lead to cr

edible source for healthy diet.

Last year, I used to drink diet coke as a way to make me feel full and satisfied while treating myself to good taste. During this time, I started to have headaches, sometimes panic attack and became lethargic. After quit drinking diet soda and drinking only water, I felt much better, become active again and my headache or anxiety attacks gradually disappeared. I researched the negative side effects of diet sodas and found out that diet sodas contains Aspartame. Aspartame is used in many food products and it is approved thoroughly by the FDA. However, people who are addicted to diet sodas they constantly reporting that they are suffering from dizziness, headaches, hair loss, joint pain, depression, anxiety attacks, slurred speech, blurred vision, or memory loss after drinking diet sodas. There are no scientific evidence that those symptoms are caused by consuming aspartame but all the claims of health problems are enough evidence to agree that aspartame may be the cause.

After reading people's stories and researching through, I can tell that once you quit for good, it will take some time for your body to heal and get health again. If you stick to it and watch your body respond in a great way, you will begin to feel healthier than you ever have before.